Thoughts of school & thoughts of fall |
Obviously this is anecdotal evidence in favor of this method. I'd be happy to research more hard data. My sense is that hard data would confirm that children do develop on an individual timeline. Certainly we can read general developmental trends but a variety of factors will point to each of our individual aptitudes & appetites.
A systematized, universally implemented educational model would be seriously challenged in addressing the nuances of each child. This is why I tend to favor unschooling, home-schooling with a lot of awareness of each child's strengths & pace, or alternative educational models such as free schools. However, that said, I have plenty of friends who are current or former teachers. One of my friends, whom I respect greatly, is very much in favor of supporting the public sector. Her belief in the public sphere helped me piece together some of my emerging ideas on how to keep learning & educational spaces vibrant.
Here's the deal: I totally concur with her or anyone else who feels that the public sector needs to be refunded. Tax money should be divested from the military & reinvested in schools (specifically some of the gutted programs like arts). However, to continue the conversation on how to teach, learn, & create space that truly recognizes each student, I very much believe in parallel structures. A year ago I heard Chris Dixon offer a talk on "Taking Ourselves Seriously" addressed to those in the left engaged in creating parallel structures like Free Schools, Housing Cooperatives, Community Gardens, DIY Bike Shops & Shares, & other collaborative community building that challenges corporatocracy. The conversation circled back to this same place & the consensus among those present returned to holding the public sphere accountable while creating viable alternatives. It shouldn't be either/or but both.
Obviously not all parents want to nor are able to home-school or unschool their children. Not all children thrive best in that environment. There should be public education that is solid, safe, & stimulating. Likewise, alternative educational models in community or in homes should exist to challenge normalization of standardized testing & other controversial practices which certainly do not serve all students nor all communities.
It's interesting trying to hold simultaneous space. Chris Dixon referred to a friend's idea of pragmatically living in the world that exists while keeping one foot in the potential world of what could be. Allowing ourselves to hold space for both so our imaginations can encompass & strive towards what truly serves us best.
I agree, Maiga. It's important to have various educational options for children, because human beings are unique. I hope my kids (if I have any) will want to be unschooled!
ReplyDeleteNoelle